US Dollar Index & Stablecoin Supply
· Updated daily
As of Jun 2026, the Trade-Weighted US Dollar Index stands at 120.89, classified as Moderately Strong. The dollar has moved +2.04% over the past 30 days and -6.91% year-over-year. DTWEXBGS measures the dollar against a basket of currencies of the major US trading partners, weighted by trade volume, normalised to January 2006 = 100. Broad dollar strength is one of the most important macro variables for stablecoins: when the dollar rises against trading partners, residents of those countries face higher local-currency costs and seek dollar-denominated stores of value, including stablecoins. Conversely, broad dollar weakness typically reflects Fed easing or risk-on conditions, both of which have historically coincided with aggregate stablecoin supply growth. The IMF's Understanding Stablecoins[1] discusses currency substitution and capital-flow volatility as the macrofinancial channels through which dollar strength relates to offshore demand for stablecoin holdings. Source: FRED series DTWEXBGS, daily from Jan 2020.
DXY vs Total Stablecoin Supply
DXY index level (right axis, orange) overlaid with total stablecoin market cap (left axis, green, from Jan 2018). Regime bands mark Fed policy periods. Watch for divergence: rising DXY typically coincides with stablecoin contraction, falling DXY with expansion, but the relationship breaks during idiosyncratic dollarization waves in specific EM corridors.
DXY Level Over Time
DXY level alone over the selected period. The 110, 115, 120 reference lines mark historically meaningful thresholds: 110 is the long-run average, 115 is moderately strong, 120+ is historically rare and typically reflects either Fed tightening cycles or global crisis-driven flight-to-quality buying.
Historically rare territory. Typically reflects an aggressive Fed tightening cycle (2022) or a global flight-to-quality event (March 2020). Strong dollar drains liquidity from EM and pressures crypto. Aggregate stablecoin supply tends to contract; corridor-specific dollarization (Turkey, Argentina) typically accelerates.
Above the long-run average. Often coincides with Fed in tightening or hold mode. EM stress elevated. Aggregate stablecoin supply growth tends to slow but not contract. Watch for divergence between major-FX-driven DXY moves (broad trend) and EM-driven moves (dollarization signal).
Near or below long-run average. Typically reflects Fed easing expectations or risk-on conditions. Constructive backdrop for stablecoin growth, both the macro liquidity and the relative attractiveness of dollar yields vs DeFi tend to favour expansion.
Historically supportive of crypto and stablecoin growth at the aggregate level. Reflects either active Fed easing, foreign currency strength, or risk-on capital flows leaving USD. EM corridors tend to see slower dollarization demand in this regime as local currencies recover.
DTWEXBGS (Trade-Weighted US Dollar Index, Broad, Goods and Services): a daily index measuring the foreign exchange value of the US dollar against a basket of currencies of major US trading partners, weighted by trade volumes. Published by the Federal Reserve, normalised to Jan 2006 = 100. Source: FRED.
vs ICE DXY: The ICE DXY index quoted in financial media uses only 6 currencies fixed in 1973, heavily Euro-weighted (~58%). DTWEXBGS uses a broader basket (~26 currencies) rebalanced annually for current trade flows, making it a more accurate measure of US dollar purchasing power across the global economy. The two indices are correlated but not identical: DTWEXBGS is the academic and policy standard; ICE DXY is the trader convention.
Regime thresholds: <108 weak, 108–115 moderately weak, 115–122 moderately strong, >122 strong. These are not formal definitions but reflect historical operating ranges since 2010. The index averaged ~110 over 2010–2025 with a standard deviation of ~5 points.
Update frequency: Daily. The Fed publishes DTWEXBGS once per business day, typically by 17:00 ET.
What this page does not prove: DXY and USDT dominance can move together without one driving the other, both may respond to a common third variable (risk-off conditions, geopolitical stress, EM capital outflows). The chart shows co-movement consistent with the dollarization-pressure hypothesis but does not establish causation. For direct EM dollarization evidence, central-bank wallet adoption data is the right source.
- Adrian, Tobias, Parma Bains, Marianne Bechara, et al. 2025. "Understanding Stablecoins." IMF Departmental Paper No. 2025/009, International Monetary Fund. imf.org/en/publications/departmental-papers/issues/2025/12/02/understanding-stablecoins-570602