CBDC
All Stablecoin Beat articles tagged “CBDC”.
Insights
Digital Euro vs Open Stablecoins
Europe's digital money debate is not a binary contest between a digital euro and crypto. It is a choice among four architectures: a retail CBDC, bank-led euro stablecoins such as the Qivalis consortium, tokenized deposits, and open stablecoin rails. The ECB has cleared a key parliamentary step for the digital euro, but holding caps and bank-centric distribution may limit its competitive force, while euro stablecoins still account for only about 0.3 percent of a roughly $300 billion market. The real question is whether digital payments become open, competitive infrastructure or get rebuilt around a few public and bank-controlled gateways. The better path is open discipline: strict reserves, enforceable redemption, bankruptcy remoteness, interoperability, and privacy safeguards across all digital money models.
More
Insights
Stablecoin Yield and the New Deposit War
Bank of America's Brian Moynihan warns that yield-bearing stablecoins could pull up to $6 trillion out of bank deposits, threatening deposit-funded lending. But deposits do not leave the financial system; they are reallocated into reserves, Treasury bills, repo, and money market funds. A White House analysis finds a yield ban would lift bank lending by only ~0.02 percent while costing savers, and IMF research points to the Treasury market, not deposit drain, as the more important channel. The real fight is over who captures the economics of digital cash, and the better answer is safe competition under strict prudential rules rather than a blunt yield prohibition.
›
Insights
BIS vs Stablecoins: The Fragmentation Debate Is Back
BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos called global stablecoin cooperation critically important in April 2026. The data tells a more specific story. At $325.4 billion and an HHI of 3,995, the stablecoin market is dominated by two issuers, not dispersed across hundreds. The fragmentation that matters is legal and operational: inconsistent reserve standards, uneven redemption rights, and jurisdiction shopping across frameworks that do not yet talk to each other.
›